The Homefront Report: Children Are Not Red Tape

At the fair, every adult understood that children need water, safety, and someone beside them. In Washington, care has become a regulatory burden.

The Trump administration has decided that the problem with Head Start is that poor children are receiving too much care. Yesterday, the Department of Health and Human Services formally proposed eliminating nearly 1,400 provisions from the regulations governing Head Start, the early childhood program serving roughly 700,000 of the nation’s most vulnerable children.

Yesterday, I didn’t publish because I was busy keeping a promise to one of mine. My daughter spent our county fair in the hospital, so we promised we would find the nearest and soonest fair and take her there. Yesterday was the day, and she was ecstatic. Her older brother rode every ride with her and never let her feel alone. Ezra played happily in his cart, then stood at the back so he could watch the world pass while we pushed him along.

Their father became the hydration station, which meant nobody was permitted to forget the existence of water for more than approximately two minutes. It was 104 degrees, and I was reminded that I am a coastal girl at heart. My natural habitat includes fog, drizzle, and the reasonable expectation that the air won’t try to cook me.

Still, the smiles were worth it. That’s what you do for the people you love. You tolerate the heat, spend too much money on overpriced fried food, become a water whisperer, ride the rides with children who aren’t tall enough to ride alone, and you sell your soul to a churro vendor in exchange for a child’s smile.

That’s ordinary American life. We worry, we have fun, we explore, and we organize ourselves around the needs of the smallest people among us. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is trying to dismantle Head Start while insisting it’s merely setting the program free.

My oldest son and my daughter both attended Head Start. I don’t have to imagine whether it works, I watched it work. Head Start wasn’t simply a room where children remained alive until their parents returned. It gave them structure, education, health support, social development, and adults trained to notice when something was wrong. It helped our family, just as it has helped millions of families since the program began.

According to The Associated Press, the current Head Start rulebook requires low staff-to-child ratios, research-backed curricula, medical and dental screenings, developmental assessments, protections from lead exposure, and family support services. Staff members help parents set goals, locate resources, continue their education, and find stability.

The administration’s proposal would erase many of those requirements and allow state licensing rules to replace federal Head Start standards on class sizes, staffing, education, background checks, transportation, and other essential operations.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called Head Start “a program that works for the most vulnerable of the poorest kids in our society.”

Then his department proposed removing many of the things that make it work. Apparently, reverence is when you compliment a structure immediately before removing its load-bearing walls. HHS claims the changes could save $2.2 billion and preserve or create as many as 236,000 enrollment slots. The Associated Press reported that some of those savings would come from cutting staff and allowing class sizes to grow. This is being sold as efficiency, it’s actually austerity wearing a cheerful lanyard.

An analysis cited by The Associated Press found that approximately 80 percent of Head Start students could end up with worse staff-to-child ratios under state licensing standards. In Mississippi, for example, Head Start currently allows one teacher to care for four 2-year-olds. State rules permit one adult to supervise as many as 12. Anyone who believes one adult caring for 12 toddlers represents freedom has never attempted to keep one toddler clothed in a public place.

The administration says programs could choose to retain the current protections. Well of course they could, they could also choose to grow a money tree in the playground and use it to pay the teachers whose positions are being treated as excess overhead. A standard that disappears when money gets tight isn’t a standard, it’s a suggestion dropped in a gold box.

The proposal would also eliminate deadlines for health and developmental screenings, detailed requirements for preventing lead exposure, and rules directing Head Start programs to provide comprehensive family support. Children may still receive those services if individual programs can afford them, individual states require them, and local administrators decide to preserve them.

The federal government isn’t protecting children by making protection optional, no matter how they want to spin it, and this contempt for care doesn’t stop at the classroom door. The Associated Press reported that Trump signed two new executive actions aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, only weeks after the Supreme Court rejected his previous attempt. One targets so-called birth tourism, while the other seeks to deny automatic citizenship to certain categories of children born on American soil. The Constitution says birthright citizenship is a guarantee, Trump continues treating it like a coupon whose terms he can revise with a Sharpie.

The Associated Press also found that immigration authorities have detained at least 52 parents and spouses of active-duty service members since Trump returned to office. At least six have been deported, one left the country voluntarily, and at least eight remained in federal custody when the investigation was published.

For decades, military families generally received special consideration while seeking legal status. Military recruiters have even advertised immigration protections as a benefit of enlistment. Now the government can recruit someone by promising to help protect their family, send that person to serve the country, and detain the family while they’re gone. Patriotism, apparently, is sacred until somebody asks the government to honor the brochure.

These stories belong together because they reveal the same governing instinct. Head Start protections become burdens, citizenship becomes conditional, and military families become enforcement targets. Every promise is negotiable, and every safeguard is treated as an obstacle standing between the administration and the next act of cruelty.

Families understand what this government doesn’t. Children need more than an available chair. They need adults who can see them, teach them, protect them, check their health, notice their struggles, and make sure they’re not left alone. We already know how to do this. We do it at county fairs in 104-degree heat, we pass the water, we push the cart, and we ride beside the child who isn’t tall enough to ride alone. The government is supposed to be what we built to do those things together. Care isn’t waste, protection isn’t red tape, and belonging isn’t a favor. A government worthy of its people would make that care stronger. Trump is trying to make it optional.

P.S. Our subscription rates for new paid subscribers will increase on 08/15/2026. Upgrade before then to lock in our current price of $7/month or $70/year. Existing paid subscribers will keep their current rate. Learn more here:

An Important Subscription Update