Death by Denial
The Eugene medical collapse, a CEO murder trial, and the coming corporate takeover of Bay Area Hospital
In Eugene, Oregon, a cancer patient named Lisa Fragala received a letter one day—just a letter. It wasn’t an appointment reminder. It wasn’t follow-up instructions from her doctor. It was a form notification from the Oregon Medical Group informing her that she no longer had a primary care provider. No explanation. No new contact. No clear plan for continuity of care.
What Lisa didn’t know then was that her doctor hadn’t simply retired or moved away. They’d been silenced, bound by a non-compete agreement after UnitedHealth’s powerful subsidiary Optum acquired the Oregon Medical Group in 2020 and triggered a mass exodus of physicians. Thirty-two doctors quit. Thousands of patients, some amid life-threatening diagnoses, were left to fend for themselves in a collapsing care network. Some waited over a year to find new providers. Others never did.
This story is about deliberate design, a vertically integrated corporate structure where insurance conglomerates like UnitedHealth now own the doctors, the clinics, and even the pharmacies. Their goal isn’t healing, it’s efficiency. Not in the Hippocratic sense, but in the Wall Street sense, maximizing shareholder returns by minimizing the time, autonomy, and cost associated with patient care.
And now, in a quietly brewing storm here on the southern Oregon coast, we may be next. Bay Area Hospital, the region’s only major medical center, is under consideration for sale. Private equity firms are circling, and we’d be wise to take a long, hard look at what just happened 100 miles north before anyone signs on a dotted line.
What happened in Eugene is a crystal ball. Doctors weren’t simply overworked; they were overridden. Patient visits were cut to 15-minute slots by corporate fiat. Providers could no longer spend the time they felt ethically obligated to give. They were told not to speak to patients once they left. Some were even prohibited from practicing medicine in the area. It’s one thing to lose a doctor. It’s another to be kept deliberately in the dark about where they went.
State Representative Ben Bowman, now Oregon House Majority Leader, stepped in with legislation, Senate Bill 951, to address what he rightly called the “corrosion of clinical independence.” The bill would close loopholes allowing corporate ownership to mask itself behind friendly physician proxies. It would limit non-competes, ban gag orders, and restore some measure of ethical autonomy to medicine. Bowman’s efforts, now bolstered by Lisa Fragala herself (who ran for office and won), represent the bare minimum a functioning democracy should be doing to defend the doctor-patient relationship from Wall Street.
But there’s a reason Optum fought it. A lobbyist told Bowman’s office outright: if Oregon’s reform became law, other states might follow. That’s the fear. Not patient safety, not access to care, but the loss of market dominance.
This is the environment in which the proposed Bay Area Hospital sale would occur. And if you’re tempted to dismiss all this as sensationalism, or as a one-off failure limited to Eugene, consider the words of Warren Buffett. The billionaire investor, hardly a populist firebrand, once described the American healthcare system as “a tapeworm” eating away at the country’s economic vitality. He noted that while the U.S. spends more than 18% of its GDP on healthcare, up from 5% in 1960, other advanced countries manage to provide care at far lower costs, with better outcomes, and without bankrupting their citizens.
Buffett, alongside JPMorgan and Amazon, tried to fix the system. They failed. “Every dollar has a constituency,” he said. “And the resistance will be unbelievable.”
He was talking about institutionalized profiteering. About companies like UnitedHealth, whose growth strategy isn’t rooted in innovation or healing, but in acquisition, consolidation, and denial.
The backlash to this kind of cruelty is rising. The trial of Luigi Mangione, accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, has sparked outrage and protest. Demonstrators outside the courtroom aren’t just chanting for justice, they’re accusing UnitedHealth of waging slow, bureaucratic violence on the American people. “Who’s the real terrorist?” one sign asked. “UHC.”
To be clear: violence is never justified. But if we fail to see the corporate system that breeds this level of rage, we miss the deeper sickness. People aren’t just angry, they feel hunted, dehumanized, and discarded by a machine that profits from their suffering. When thousands of people lose access to care because of a merger, when letters replace doctors, and when shareholder value is placed above a cancer diagnosis, what do we call that?
Luigi Mangione’s case will be tried in court. But the corporate violence of denied care, burnout, and bureaucratic cruelty rarely sees a courtroom. No executive will be indicted for the cancer patient left to navigate a broken system alone. No board member will stand trial for prioritizing shareholders over human lives. That’s the violence we’ve legalized.
The crisis unfolding in Eugene is not an aberration. It is a business model. Unless we act, Bay Area Hospital may be next in line.
If you want to stop this, don’t wait for a letter in the mail. Show up. Speak out. Attend board meetings. Contact your local officials. Demand transparency. Demand protection. Because once it’s sold, and the gag orders are in place, you won’t get a second chance to save it.
Acknowledgment:
Much of the reporting and narrative around the collapse of Oregon Medical Group, the exodus of physicians in Eugene, and the corporate overreach of Optum and UnitedHealth was powerfully documented by More Perfect Union. Their investigative work has been vital in exposing how these corporate structures function and fail the people they’re meant to serve. You can find their full video report here or via their social media channels. They deserve credit not just for telling the story, but for making it impossible to ignore.
I have several physician friends who feel the same way, sadly. Thank you for sharing.
Despite the shortcomings of the NHS, as a Brit I give thanks for it every time I read something like this about U.S. healthcare. I won’t call it a system because it doesn’t qualify as one.
It is a racket which exploits illness for the benefit of insurance companies and some others involved in it. It has got no connection to the welfare of nation as the current hearing featuring the new Secretary of Health demonstrates.